<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for OutDPS!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://outdps.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://outdps.com</link>
	<description>Standing in void zones since 2008</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 23:32:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Podcast outage and update by Podcast outage and update &#124; WoW Hunters Hall</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/02/01/podcast-outage-and-update/#comment-8530</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Podcast outage and update &#124; WoW Hunters Hall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 23:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=5441#comment-8530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] show to them, they went down. Right after I posted that the Kruf episode (116) was working again. Read full article.         (No Ratings Yet) &#160;Loading [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] show to them, they went down. Right after I posted that the Kruf episode (116) was working again. Read full article.         (No Ratings Yet) &nbsp;Loading [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 116! by Nagrenol</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/01/28/episode-116/#comment-8528</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nagrenol]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=5195#comment-8528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But sure anyone who&#039;s played the game for any period of time knew that. There&#039;s is no where to discuss the changes and issues, blizzard will always point to the forums but really.. they know that any good idea gets smothered under a sea of trolling and shite posts/comments. 

They really have no clue what they are at, or should I say they really don&#039;t give a toss in general. All the comments they make are pure business comments and more and more over recent months/years its become all to clear they are losing interest in the game as gamers game and just want it to be a game everyone can play and get purplez n organez and keeel ze dragons as fast as possible.

Yeah it&#039;s been said a million times before but the crapness of cata sums it up for me, that panda rubbish will be another load of rehashed crap with some new zone people will grow bored of within the the first month and then guess what.. back to org/sw afking on this months l33t mount.

If your a altaholic then maybe there&#039;s something to do, but the game has totally lost the &#039;spirit&#039; it once had. 
The game to a small degree still has some essence of it for the top 10/20 guilds for getting world first but with the advent of 10 man guilds being able to get server first etc.. its taken so much out of it. 

I&#039;ll stop typing now as I could go on about it all day in detail where it went wrong and how etc etc but it matters not.
Good times were had but they are few and far between anymore.

I still love my hunter though, first and only char played since day 1 :D

Looking at /played makes me cringe now -_-]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But sure anyone who&#8217;s played the game for any period of time knew that. There&#8217;s is no where to discuss the changes and issues, blizzard will always point to the forums but really.. they know that any good idea gets smothered under a sea of trolling and shite posts/comments. </p>
<p>They really have no clue what they are at, or should I say they really don&#8217;t give a toss in general. All the comments they make are pure business comments and more and more over recent months/years its become all to clear they are losing interest in the game as gamers game and just want it to be a game everyone can play and get purplez n organez and keeel ze dragons as fast as possible.</p>
<p>Yeah it&#8217;s been said a million times before but the crapness of cata sums it up for me, that panda rubbish will be another load of rehashed crap with some new zone people will grow bored of within the the first month and then guess what.. back to org/sw afking on this months l33t mount.</p>
<p>If your a altaholic then maybe there&#8217;s something to do, but the game has totally lost the &#8216;spirit&#8217; it once had.<br />
The game to a small degree still has some essence of it for the top 10/20 guilds for getting world first but with the advent of 10 man guilds being able to get server first etc.. its taken so much out of it. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll stop typing now as I could go on about it all day in detail where it went wrong and how etc etc but it matters not.<br />
Good times were had but they are few and far between anymore.</p>
<p>I still love my hunter though, first and only char played since day 1 :D</p>
<p>Looking at /played makes me cringe now -_-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Podcast outage and update by tdf</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/02/01/podcast-outage-and-update/#comment-8527</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tdf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=5441#comment-8527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is there anything you can do to reduce the filesize of the mp3s without sacrificing quality? I listen to some other podcasts which are about the same length and the files are around 20-30MB. Might help with your bills.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there anything you can do to reduce the filesize of the mp3s without sacrificing quality? I listen to some other podcasts which are about the same length and the files are around 20-30MB. Might help with your bills.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Podcast outage and update by Bozanimal</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/02/01/podcast-outage-and-update/#comment-8522</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bozanimal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=5441#comment-8522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ugh, hosting issues; best of luck.

Also, does this mean we&#039;ll be getting the 100th episode outtakes at some point?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh, hosting issues; best of luck.</p>
<p>Also, does this mean we&#8217;ll be getting the 100th episode outtakes at some point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Podcast outage and update by bahzob</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/02/01/podcast-outage-and-update/#comment-8520</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bahzob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 09:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=5441#comment-8520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the update. Very much appreciate the time and effort you put into getting the podcast out to the masses.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the update. Very much appreciate the time and effort you put into getting the podcast out to the masses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Podcast outage and update by Kalven</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/02/01/podcast-outage-and-update/#comment-8519</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kalven]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 09:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=5441#comment-8519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fail reply. This was in reference to Ep. 116.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fail reply. This was in reference to Ep. 116.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Podcast outage and update by Kalven</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/02/01/podcast-outage-and-update/#comment-8518</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kalven]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 09:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=5441#comment-8518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I secretly love being a DK too! Also a dwarf, also started for the Profs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I secretly love being a DK too! Also a dwarf, also started for the Profs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 116! by eidotrope</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/01/28/episode-116/#comment-8513</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eidotrope]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=5195#comment-8513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with the point about curtailing opinions.  It&#039;s not that I dislike the hosts, I just really dislike it when they have an expert guest but prefer expounding at great length on their own less-informed opinions over letting the guest share his or her expertise.  Episode 74 was an example of that, if I remember right.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the point about curtailing opinions.  It&#8217;s not that I dislike the hosts, I just really dislike it when they have an expert guest but prefer expounding at great length on their own less-informed opinions over letting the guest share his or her expertise.  Episode 74 was an example of that, if I remember right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dragon Soul Class Guides by dd</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/01/29/dragon-soul-class-guides/#comment-8510</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=5173#comment-8510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thx mate, pretty useful compilation]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thx mate, pretty useful compilation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Soloing for A Treatise on Strategy by Vcbeii</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/01/05/soloing-for-a-treatise-on-strategy/#comment-8508</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vcbeii]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 23:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=5031#comment-8508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What kind of armor did u use? (dont want to go looking though the achives)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What kind of armor did u use? (dont want to go looking though the achives)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 116! by zigzags</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/01/28/episode-116/#comment-8507</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[zigzags]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 21:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=5195#comment-8507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kruf gives more info on the hunter class than pretty much any other source out there. A 20 minute conversation is so riveting and informative!

I often exchange notes as well with Kripparian (or did in the past anyway) and found him to be an equally insightful player.

i like it when the hosts curtail their own opinions (which while sometimes fun, are often just anedotal and limited by their own more-or-less average skill sets). 

it is great that there&#039;s a venue/podcast for Kruf and his like. hopefully not the last time we get to hear from him!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kruf gives more info on the hunter class than pretty much any other source out there. A 20 minute conversation is so riveting and informative!</p>
<p>I often exchange notes as well with Kripparian (or did in the past anyway) and found him to be an equally insightful player.</p>
<p>i like it when the hosts curtail their own opinions (which while sometimes fun, are often just anedotal and limited by their own more-or-less average skill sets). </p>
<p>it is great that there&#8217;s a venue/podcast for Kruf and his like. hopefully not the last time we get to hear from him!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 116! by Magua</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/01/28/episode-116/#comment-8505</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Magua]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=5195#comment-8505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think Cataclysm was exceedingly enjoyable during 4.0, but I ended up quitting because it took too long for 4.1 to come out and I got bored of 4.0.  I think the design intentions of Cata is what can be expected from now on from Blizz and that is to get every single person to see as much content as possible even if it means it is faceroll through LFR, Normal, and even heroic Morchok and beyond.  Normal mode raiding now is meant for casuals and &quot;real&quot; raiding is probably only going to be found in heroic modes for people that want to bring back the Vanilla/BC days.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Cataclysm was exceedingly enjoyable during 4.0, but I ended up quitting because it took too long for 4.1 to come out and I got bored of 4.0.  I think the design intentions of Cata is what can be expected from now on from Blizz and that is to get every single person to see as much content as possible even if it means it is faceroll through LFR, Normal, and even heroic Morchok and beyond.  Normal mode raiding now is meant for casuals and &#8220;real&#8221; raiding is probably only going to be found in heroic modes for people that want to bring back the Vanilla/BC days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Uses for the New Deterrence in PVE by bahzob</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/01/21/uses-for-the-new-deterrence-in-pve/#comment-8503</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bahzob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 09:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=5113#comment-8503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PS. To head off the response that this is just more QQ. Listen to podcast 116 and what Kruf has to say.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS. To head off the response that this is just more QQ. Listen to podcast 116 and what Kruf has to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Uses for the New Deterrence in PVE by bahzob</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/01/21/uses-for-the-new-deterrence-in-pve/#comment-8502</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bahzob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 09:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=5113#comment-8502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Read the thread I quoted mate before throwing accusations.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read the thread I quoted mate before throwing accusations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Uses for the New Deterrence in PVE by bahzob</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/01/21/uses-for-the-new-deterrence-in-pve/#comment-8501</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bahzob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 09:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=5113#comment-8501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scroll down to post 25 in the thread I quoted.

Yes I QQ about how bad WOW and Blizzard are. With good reason. The thread is just a small example. I could cite the whole of Cataclysm. If anyone can make a case against the assertion that it is, by a large margin, the worst expansion so far then I&#039;d be interested to hear it. 

I find it utterly baffling that people accept such shoddy content from a company they pay good money to, then demonise those who complain about it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scroll down to post 25 in the thread I quoted.</p>
<p>Yes I QQ about how bad WOW and Blizzard are. With good reason. The thread is just a small example. I could cite the whole of Cataclysm. If anyone can make a case against the assertion that it is, by a large margin, the worst expansion so far then I&#8217;d be interested to hear it. </p>
<p>I find it utterly baffling that people accept such shoddy content from a company they pay good money to, then demonise those who complain about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 116! by bahzob</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/01/28/episode-116/#comment-8498</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bahzob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 14:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=5195#comment-8498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Downloaded. In a way wish I hadn&#039;t. Kruf tells it like it is. Cataclysm was a fail. Not just regarding hunters but the whole game.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Downloaded. In a way wish I hadn&#8217;t. Kruf tells it like it is. Cataclysm was a fail. Not just regarding hunters but the whole game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 116! by Euripides</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/01/28/episode-116/#comment-8497</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Euripides]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 13:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=5195#comment-8497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That would be the sound of our ftp server dying :(]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would be the sound of our ftp server dying :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 116! by tadedra</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/01/28/episode-116/#comment-8496</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tadedra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 13:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=5195#comment-8496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tried to listen on website -- File not found.  Sad face!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tried to listen on website &#8212; File not found.  Sad face!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Uses for the New Deterrence in PVE by Cydearrm</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/01/21/uses-for-the-new-deterrence-in-pve/#comment-8494</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cydearrm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 02:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=5113#comment-8494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Kalven

No, he just wants to troll.  He QQ&#039;s at least twice a week about how bad WoW and Blizzard are at WHU.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kalven</p>
<p>No, he just wants to troll.  He QQ&#8217;s at least twice a week about how bad WoW and Blizzard are at WHU.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 115! by bahzob</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/01/26/episode-115/#comment-8489</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bahzob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=5193#comment-8489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BM new spec of choice for PVP??  

No it isnt. 

MM is still best spec because it offers far more in terms burst and control.  It also brings the AP buff if thats missing from the other team members.

Thats not to say there are not good BM PVPers out there but they are less in number and very limited in terms of play options basically just being a zerg cleave. 

Where BM does come into its own is random BGs where healing cant be guaranteed.  In rated BGs however MM would almost always be spec of choice for same reasons as above.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BM new spec of choice for PVP??  </p>
<p>No it isnt. </p>
<p>MM is still best spec because it offers far more in terms burst and control.  It also brings the AP buff if thats missing from the other team members.</p>
<p>Thats not to say there are not good BM PVPers out there but they are less in number and very limited in terms of play options basically just being a zerg cleave. </p>
<p>Where BM does come into its own is random BGs where healing cant be guaranteed.  In rated BGs however MM would almost always be spec of choice for same reasons as above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Uses for the New Deterrence in PVE by Kalven</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/01/21/uses-for-the-new-deterrence-in-pve/#comment-8488</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kalven]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=5113#comment-8488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you have any corroborating sources?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you have any corroborating sources?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Uses for the New Deterrence in PVE by bahzob</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/01/21/uses-for-the-new-deterrence-in-pve/#comment-8485</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bahzob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=5113#comment-8485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over in AJ http://www.arenajunkies.com/topic/218834-pve-trinkets-going-through-deterrence/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over in AJ <a href="http://www.arenajunkies.com/topic/218834-pve-trinkets-going-through-deterrence/" rel="nofollow">http://www.arenajunkies.com/topic/218834-pve-trinkets-going-through-deterrence/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thoughts on the Raid Finder by cb</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/01/10/thoughts-on-the-raid-finder/#comment-8482</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=4962#comment-8482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hahahaha. Oh Mehere, what a goofy comment. this post was a thorough look at the pros and cons and potential consequences of the LFR. It was insightful and raised some interesting talking points. 

Mehere maybe try reading it again? 

i actually did the LFR for the first time last night. I&#039;d been away from the for about 4 months due to burn out from FL raid and grind repetition. It took about 2 hours to do the entire Dragon Soul raid. We were never in any danger of wiping. the lead tanks imparted simply, but perfectly succinct instructions and the rest of the group seemed to know how to follow them.

Overall it was really cool to be able to whip through a major end-of-expansion raid... but... that&#039;s sort of it for me. i&#039;m not really a gear guy (i got no drops) so that&#039;s not my motivation for raiding; though it is a great treat... so really after i was done, i thought, why keep going? if this were a console, single player game, would i go back and start again at a higher difficulty level? maybe, but probably not. 

so today i unsubscribed. might as well save 6 months of $$ until MOP comes out.

i think that&#039;s the real downside, at least from Blizzard&#039;s point of view... 

still, what a nice way to avoid loot and guild drama; to avoid the endless grind to get gold for repairs; to avoid gear criticism etc... 

i think your pros/cons list was bang on. 

great piece. love what you do here.

316, hunter, turalyon, horde.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hahahaha. Oh Mehere, what a goofy comment. this post was a thorough look at the pros and cons and potential consequences of the LFR. It was insightful and raised some interesting talking points. </p>
<p>Mehere maybe try reading it again? </p>
<p>i actually did the LFR for the first time last night. I&#8217;d been away from the for about 4 months due to burn out from FL raid and grind repetition. It took about 2 hours to do the entire Dragon Soul raid. We were never in any danger of wiping. the lead tanks imparted simply, but perfectly succinct instructions and the rest of the group seemed to know how to follow them.</p>
<p>Overall it was really cool to be able to whip through a major end-of-expansion raid&#8230; but&#8230; that&#8217;s sort of it for me. i&#8217;m not really a gear guy (i got no drops) so that&#8217;s not my motivation for raiding; though it is a great treat&#8230; so really after i was done, i thought, why keep going? if this were a console, single player game, would i go back and start again at a higher difficulty level? maybe, but probably not. </p>
<p>so today i unsubscribed. might as well save 6 months of $$ until MOP comes out.</p>
<p>i think that&#8217;s the real downside, at least from Blizzard&#8217;s point of view&#8230; </p>
<p>still, what a nice way to avoid loot and guild drama; to avoid the endless grind to get gold for repairs; to avoid gear criticism etc&#8230; </p>
<p>i think your pros/cons list was bang on. </p>
<p>great piece. love what you do here.</p>
<p>316, hunter, turalyon, horde.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Uses for the New Deterrence in PVE by bahzob</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/01/21/uses-for-the-new-deterrence-in-pve/#comment-8481</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bahzob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=5113#comment-8481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No it isnt. It&#039;s crap. Most other classes get damage reduction CDs that allow them to continue to DPS.  These classes will still be preferable to for situations where you need to combine high burst with good survivability (Madness bolts for example).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No it isnt. It&#8217;s crap. Most other classes get damage reduction CDs that allow them to continue to DPS.  These classes will still be preferable to for situations where you need to combine high burst with good survivability (Madness bolts for example).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Soloing Slabhide by john</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2011/01/26/soloing-slabhide/#comment-8479</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[john]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=3389#comment-8479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ive killed him 87 times and still no drake!!!!!!!!!!! HELP ME]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ive killed him 87 times and still no drake!!!!!!!!!!! HELP ME</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Uses for the New Deterrence in PVE by Kalven</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/01/21/uses-for-the-new-deterrence-in-pve/#comment-8471</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kalven]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 22:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=5113#comment-8471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another macro option for canceling Deterrence is adding it to shots. My shot macros all include:

#showtooltip
/cancelaura hand of protection
/cancelaura deterrence
/use (shot)
/startattack]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another macro option for canceling Deterrence is adding it to shots. My shot macros all include:</p>
<p>#showtooltip<br />
/cancelaura hand of protection<br />
/cancelaura deterrence<br />
/use (shot)<br />
/startattack</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Uses for the New Deterrence in PVE by Deviltrigger</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/01/21/uses-for-the-new-deterrence-in-pve/#comment-8466</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deviltrigger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 16:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=5113#comment-8466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s an awesome &quot;O shi-&quot; button. Especially on the elementium bolt and when people f up on the ragnaros adds. xD]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s an awesome &#8220;O shi-&#8221; button. Especially on the elementium bolt and when people f up on the ragnaros adds. xD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Valor Trinket is Not That Bad by arizona</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/01/13/the-valor-trinket-is-not-that-bad/#comment-8448</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[arizona]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 12:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=5129#comment-8448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I switched from my compass (384) to the sigil, because in my tests on the dummy I experienced that the compass proc and the 4pT13 proc did overlap a lot and I didn&#039;t like it. Did anyone notice that, too?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I switched from my compass (384) to the sigil, because in my tests on the dummy I experienced that the compass proc and the 4pT13 proc did overlap a lot and I didn&#8217;t like it. Did anyone notice that, too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Valor Trinket is Not That Bad by Guntitan</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/01/13/the-valor-trinket-is-not-that-bad/#comment-8446</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guntitan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 20:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=5129#comment-8446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On use trinkets are pro. I like how they line up with Bestial Wrath. I was lucky enough to obtain trinkets early on this patch. Maybe I can borrow it for 2 hours and test it out. Good points about the proc lining up with the bosses.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On use trinkets are pro. I like how they line up with Bestial Wrath. I was lucky enough to obtain trinkets early on this patch. Maybe I can borrow it for 2 hours and test it out. Good points about the proc lining up with the bosses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Valor Trinket is Not That Bad by stewiefied</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/01/13/the-valor-trinket-is-not-that-bad/#comment-8444</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stewiefied]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=5129#comment-8444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m really liking this trinket as survival. Picked it up since I had the extra valor and two haste proc trinkets (lfr starcatchers and arrow of time) didn&#039;t seem ideal.
There seems to be quite a bit of fights with burst phases in DS. Spine, Hagara, and zon all have great times to use this trinket. Once I get vial/ wrath ill just swap the sigil in on these fights. 
It feels like blizzard planned for these on use valor trinkets to be a third trinket that we should have at our disposal for DS.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m really liking this trinket as survival. Picked it up since I had the extra valor and two haste proc trinkets (lfr starcatchers and arrow of time) didn&#8217;t seem ideal.<br />
There seems to be quite a bit of fights with burst phases in DS. Spine, Hagara, and zon all have great times to use this trinket. Once I get vial/ wrath ill just swap the sigil in on these fights.<br />
It feels like blizzard planned for these on use valor trinkets to be a third trinket that we should have at our disposal for DS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Valor Trinket is Not That Bad by eidotrope</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/01/13/the-valor-trinket-is-not-that-bad/#comment-8442</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eidotrope]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=5129#comment-8442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah, sorry, to clarify, my question was referring to the five phase situations, not the three gear situations.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, sorry, to clarify, my question was referring to the five phase situations, not the three gear situations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Valor Trinket is Not That Bad by Whitefyst</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/01/13/the-valor-trinket-is-not-that-bad/#comment-8441</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Whitefyst]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=5129#comment-8441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Q: Are you averaging across the five situations to reach the numbers in the final paragraph?

A: No averaging of the numbers for the cases occurred. The 1900 to 2400 less damage brackets the range in the amount of change between each case. The lowest DPS change between the cases was 1900 and the largest 2400 when comparing a) and b), with 6800 being the smallest and 7400 the largest between b) and c). I then took the most favorable results for the Sigil (smallest change between a) and b) and largest change between b) and c)) to provide the best case scenario for the Sigil.

Q:
Also, in situation a), am I right to assume that you only have the Compass equipped for trinkets?

In both cases, I was using my other trinket for the second trinket. So the only difference netween a) and b)/c) is the whether the Compass or Sigil was used.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Q: Are you averaging across the five situations to reach the numbers in the final paragraph?</p>
<p>A: No averaging of the numbers for the cases occurred. The 1900 to 2400 less damage brackets the range in the amount of change between each case. The lowest DPS change between the cases was 1900 and the largest 2400 when comparing a) and b), with 6800 being the smallest and 7400 the largest between b) and c). I then took the most favorable results for the Sigil (smallest change between a) and b) and largest change between b) and c)) to provide the best case scenario for the Sigil.</p>
<p>Q:<br />
Also, in situation a), am I right to assume that you only have the Compass equipped for trinkets?</p>
<p>In both cases, I was using my other trinket for the second trinket. So the only difference netween a) and b)/c) is the whether the Compass or Sigil was used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 114! by Omogon</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/01/13/episode-114/#comment-8440</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Omogon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 20:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=5140#comment-8440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yup.....pretty sad when Big Red Kitty does not use his big red kitty.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yup&#8230;..pretty sad when Big Red Kitty does not use his big red kitty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 114! by bahzob</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/01/13/episode-114/#comment-8436</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bahzob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 09:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=5140#comment-8436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m gobsmacked that even BRK has given up on BM. If any final proof was needed of how much the spec has been failed this expansion this must have been it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m gobsmacked that even BRK has given up on BM. If any final proof was needed of how much the spec has been failed this expansion this must have been it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Valor Trinket is Not That Bad by Ril</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/01/13/the-valor-trinket-is-not-that-bad/#comment-8435</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ril]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 08:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=5129#comment-8435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s a good question, and 1:10 min cooldown is correct, I misinterpreted 1.17 min in the tooltip, was probably tierd :) ... I never actually ran the numbers because I won&#039;t be using it in normal circumstances, where you want to blow BW on CD. But I know my DPS is greatest when I use it directly on a pull, for example, without waiting for procs like Kiril, I had enough time on Ultraxion&amp;co to test that.

But if you delayed BW by 20 seconds, that&#039;d be one less in a fight that lasts 3.5 minutes. For example, in a 6 minute fight, which is very current, it would be 4 (you could fit a 5th cast in, but the fight would end when you press the button) instead of 6. I wouldn&#039;t do that unless in situations like Spine heroic, where it really matters where the burst damage lands.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a good question, and 1:10 min cooldown is correct, I misinterpreted 1.17 min in the tooltip, was probably tierd :) &#8230; I never actually ran the numbers because I won&#8217;t be using it in normal circumstances, where you want to blow BW on CD. But I know my DPS is greatest when I use it directly on a pull, for example, without waiting for procs like Kiril, I had enough time on Ultraxion&amp;co to test that.</p>
<p>But if you delayed BW by 20 seconds, that&#8217;d be one less in a fight that lasts 3.5 minutes. For example, in a 6 minute fight, which is very current, it would be 4 (you could fit a 5th cast in, but the fight would end when you press the button) instead of 6. I wouldn&#8217;t do that unless in situations like Spine heroic, where it really matters where the burst damage lands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Valor Trinket is Not That Bad by Kalven</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/01/13/the-valor-trinket-is-not-that-bad/#comment-8432</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kalven]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 18:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=5129#comment-8432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[20 second, I mean. I&#039;m rusty on BM PvE.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>20 second, I mean. I&#8217;m rusty on BM PvE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Valor Trinket is Not That Bad by Kalven</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/01/13/the-valor-trinket-is-not-that-bad/#comment-8431</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kalven]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 18:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=5129#comment-8431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Depending on fight length, could it be a DPS gain to delay BW by 13 sec to align with this trinket? I&#039;m going to explore this best I can, but I&#039;m not very experienced with theorycrafting.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Depending on fight length, could it be a DPS gain to delay BW by 13 sec to align with this trinket? I&#8217;m going to explore this best I can, but I&#8217;m not very experienced with theorycrafting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tier 13 Hunter Tips and Tricks by Franses</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2011/12/11/tier-13-hunter-tips-and-tricks/#comment-8427</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Franses]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 01:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=4933#comment-8427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If u go to the &quot;blue platform&quot; and DPS down the wing to 75% doesn´t it trigger tentacle behind the Hunter? 

and 

&quot;The tentacles deal more damage the lower the big tentacle’s health is, and the hunter should keep this in mind so as to not die.&quot; didn´t understand that really, do u mean that if a tentacle is up on another platform the Blistering tentacles will deal more damage on me?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If u go to the &#8220;blue platform&#8221; and DPS down the wing to 75% doesn´t it trigger tentacle behind the Hunter? </p>
<p>and </p>
<p>&#8220;The tentacles deal more damage the lower the big tentacle’s health is, and the hunter should keep this in mind so as to not die.&#8221; didn´t understand that really, do u mean that if a tentacle is up on another platform the Blistering tentacles will deal more damage on me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Valor Trinket is Not That Bad by Ril</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/01/13/the-valor-trinket-is-not-that-bad/#comment-8424</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ril]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 12:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=5129#comment-8424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i think that i&#039;ll get that trinket for spine heroic (we&#039;re going to be there soon) for BM. as everything seems to depend on the tendon-burst, meaning that i&#039;ll be saving BW for this, it is an awesome combo!

unfortunately, there&#039;s no situation i can think of where the BM cool down lines up well with boss abilities or procs, that&#039;s really a pity and in some situations annoying like hell. 1:17 vs 1 min (many boss abilities and items like kiril) or 1:30 (this trinket).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think that i&#8217;ll get that trinket for spine heroic (we&#8217;re going to be there soon) for BM. as everything seems to depend on the tendon-burst, meaning that i&#8217;ll be saving BW for this, it is an awesome combo!</p>
<p>unfortunately, there&#8217;s no situation i can think of where the BM cool down lines up well with boss abilities or procs, that&#8217;s really a pity and in some situations annoying like hell. 1:17 vs 1 min (many boss abilities and items like kiril) or 1:30 (this trinket).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Valor Trinket is Not That Bad by eidotrope</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/01/13/the-valor-trinket-is-not-that-bad/#comment-8422</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eidotrope]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 00:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=5129#comment-8422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for this analysis, but I&#039;m a bit unclear on something.  Are you averaging across the five situations to reach the numbers in the final paragraph?  Also, in situation a), am I right to assume that you only have the Compass equipped for trinkets?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this analysis, but I&#8217;m a bit unclear on something.  Are you averaging across the five situations to reach the numbers in the final paragraph?  Also, in situation a), am I right to assume that you only have the Compass equipped for trinkets?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Valor Trinket is Not That Bad by Whitefyst</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/01/13/the-valor-trinket-is-not-that-bad/#comment-8421</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Whitefyst]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 00:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=5129#comment-8421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A little more information on the trinket for MMs. I did 15s analysis in FD of the following 5 fight phase situations with no BL included in any:
1) CA with RF
2) RF during Standard phase
3) RF during KS phase
4) Standard phase unhasted
5) KS phase unhasted

I did the analysis for each of the following situations:
a) My current gear with Starcatcher Compass. Note that the duration of the Compass proc is 20s instead of 15s so the DPS benefit for this case is a little higher.
b) No second trinket equiped but simulating the 458 static haste of Sigil by hand editing the amount with 183 of it reforged as crit. Assumes that no other reforging is done.
c) In addition to b) adds the 2290 agi for the use of Sigil.

Compared to the a) cases, the b) cases did between 1900 to 2400 less damage while the c) cases did between 6800 and 7400 damage. Even with using the spread that most favors Sigil, the damage ratio of C) versus against b) versus a) is only 7400/1900 = 3.89. Since this is much less that the minimum 5 to 1 ratio of Sigil downtime to uptime, Sigil is definitely a worse trinket than the Compass for overall DOPS.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A little more information on the trinket for MMs. I did 15s analysis in FD of the following 5 fight phase situations with no BL included in any:<br />
1) CA with RF<br />
2) RF during Standard phase<br />
3) RF during KS phase<br />
4) Standard phase unhasted<br />
5) KS phase unhasted</p>
<p>I did the analysis for each of the following situations:<br />
a) My current gear with Starcatcher Compass. Note that the duration of the Compass proc is 20s instead of 15s so the DPS benefit for this case is a little higher.<br />
b) No second trinket equiped but simulating the 458 static haste of Sigil by hand editing the amount with 183 of it reforged as crit. Assumes that no other reforging is done.<br />
c) In addition to b) adds the 2290 agi for the use of Sigil.</p>
<p>Compared to the a) cases, the b) cases did between 1900 to 2400 less damage while the c) cases did between 6800 and 7400 damage. Even with using the spread that most favors Sigil, the damage ratio of C) versus against b) versus a) is only 7400/1900 = 3.89. Since this is much less that the minimum 5 to 1 ratio of Sigil downtime to uptime, Sigil is definitely a worse trinket than the Compass for overall DOPS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Valor Trinket is Not That Bad by Whitefyst</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/01/13/the-valor-trinket-is-not-that-bad/#comment-8420</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Whitefyst]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 23:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=5129#comment-8420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For MMs the trinket can be nice since its CD lines up well with RF. You can use it at the start of the fight with the RF during the CA phase when most of the MM attacks are ensured to be crits. Then each odd use of it after that aligns with RFs again. If you always use the trinket with RFs (can enforce this putting its use in a RF macro), especially the one at the start of the fight during the CA phase, then its value is greatly higher than what FD estimates it to be with its averaging.

The problem with the trinket is that although you can have great DPS during RFs and some other times during the fight, you are lacking in DPS over the rest of the fight since it is no agi during those times as oppossed to the 458 constant agility of other options. This means that 83% of the time you are short about 1008 AP and 1.55% crit. Hence, if critical fight situations occur then, you are going to perform worse than with other trinket options during those phases.

If you use the trinket at times where it is difficult to perform the ideal rotation (e.g., have to move, am interrupted/stunned/feared/etc, or having to switch targets), the benefit of the trinket is greatly reduced relative to the other trinkets that provide a constant benefit.  

With that said, there are definitely some fights where this trinket works out well, while on the standard fight it probably lacks a little. It makes you really awesome during the CA phase and RFs, but relatively bad the rest of the fight.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For MMs the trinket can be nice since its CD lines up well with RF. You can use it at the start of the fight with the RF during the CA phase when most of the MM attacks are ensured to be crits. Then each odd use of it after that aligns with RFs again. If you always use the trinket with RFs (can enforce this putting its use in a RF macro), especially the one at the start of the fight during the CA phase, then its value is greatly higher than what FD estimates it to be with its averaging.</p>
<p>The problem with the trinket is that although you can have great DPS during RFs and some other times during the fight, you are lacking in DPS over the rest of the fight since it is no agi during those times as oppossed to the 458 constant agility of other options. This means that 83% of the time you are short about 1008 AP and 1.55% crit. Hence, if critical fight situations occur then, you are going to perform worse than with other trinket options during those phases.</p>
<p>If you use the trinket at times where it is difficult to perform the ideal rotation (e.g., have to move, am interrupted/stunned/feared/etc, or having to switch targets), the benefit of the trinket is greatly reduced relative to the other trinkets that provide a constant benefit.  </p>
<p>With that said, there are definitely some fights where this trinket works out well, while on the standard fight it probably lacks a little. It makes you really awesome during the CA phase and RFs, but relatively bad the rest of the fight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Valor Trinket is Not That Bad by Sithrogue</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/01/13/the-valor-trinket-is-not-that-bad/#comment-8418</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sithrogue]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 16:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=5129#comment-8418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I picked it up the other night and was pleasantly surprised with how it matched many of the times I needed that extra buff of agility]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I picked it up the other night and was pleasantly surprised with how it matched many of the times I needed that extra buff of agility</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thoughts on the Raid Finder by eidotrope</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/01/10/thoughts-on-the-raid-finder/#comment-8417</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eidotrope]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 21:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=4962#comment-8417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The post is about narrative closure, similarities to the Dungeon Finder and discretionary content, so I&#039;m a bit at a loss as to where you got this whole gear elitism thing from.  It seems like you&#039;re reading what you want to read, not what I wrote.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The post is about narrative closure, similarities to the Dungeon Finder and discretionary content, so I&#8217;m a bit at a loss as to where you got this whole gear elitism thing from.  It seems like you&#8217;re reading what you want to read, not what I wrote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thoughts on the Raid Finder by Mehere</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/01/10/thoughts-on-the-raid-finder/#comment-8416</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mehere]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=4962#comment-8416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did I miss something. Is LFR required...I was pretty sure it wasn&#039;t.

This post sounds like another QQ from an elite who doesn&#039;t want people like me (don&#039;t have the time or patience for guild politics) to get half decent gear.

Unless you are forced to use LFR, which I am pretty sure you aren&#039;t. Why did you use LFR and kill DW in the first day. WHY?&gt;??????, because you could get decent gear for low time output, but then you realized that everyone could do the same and dammit that ain&#039;t right, High gear is only for you and your elite friends.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did I miss something. Is LFR required&#8230;I was pretty sure it wasn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>This post sounds like another QQ from an elite who doesn&#8217;t want people like me (don&#8217;t have the time or patience for guild politics) to get half decent gear.</p>
<p>Unless you are forced to use LFR, which I am pretty sure you aren&#8217;t. Why did you use LFR and kill DW in the first day. WHY?&gt;??????, because you could get decent gear for low time output, but then you realized that everyone could do the same and dammit that ain&#8217;t right, High gear is only for you and your elite friends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Updated 4.3.2 Patch Notes by eidotrope</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/01/09/updated-4-3-2-patch-notes/#comment-8415</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eidotrope]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=5108#comment-8415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That wasn&#039;t really the concern.  It&#039;s the crazy surivavability and damage that DKs have when there isn&#039;t, say, a hunter around who knows how to tranq Vengeance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That wasn&#8217;t really the concern.  It&#8217;s the crazy surivavability and damage that DKs have when there isn&#8217;t, say, a hunter around who knows how to tranq Vengeance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thoughts on the Raid Finder by Buck n Ear</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/01/10/thoughts-on-the-raid-finder/#comment-8414</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Buck n Ear]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=4962#comment-8414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My experience with LFR is postitive. I have been able to experience the end story content and be challenged by fights on several toons without the insane pressure of trying not to screw up and wipe a raid. I appreciate not having to wipe 10 times on a boss in LFR.
I&#039;m looking forward to putting together groups of 5,10 or 15 guildies to que for this raid to experience it together.
The gear drops are infrequent so it will take a while for someone to gear up completely using LFR. Even then, there is higher level gear available to those that wish to make the attempts on hard mode. 
Hard core raiders will still get to strut that better gear and still get that feeling of having accomplished the kills on hard mode. There will still be an incentive for LFR raiders to join others in hard modes to improve gear and participate in that type of experience.
I thnk the LFR is a success although I would not apply it backwards to Firelands, I would make it the standard for all future content.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My experience with LFR is postitive. I have been able to experience the end story content and be challenged by fights on several toons without the insane pressure of trying not to screw up and wipe a raid. I appreciate not having to wipe 10 times on a boss in LFR.<br />
I&#8217;m looking forward to putting together groups of 5,10 or 15 guildies to que for this raid to experience it together.<br />
The gear drops are infrequent so it will take a while for someone to gear up completely using LFR. Even then, there is higher level gear available to those that wish to make the attempts on hard mode.<br />
Hard core raiders will still get to strut that better gear and still get that feeling of having accomplished the kills on hard mode. There will still be an incentive for LFR raiders to join others in hard modes to improve gear and participate in that type of experience.<br />
I thnk the LFR is a success although I would not apply it backwards to Firelands, I would make it the standard for all future content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Blue Post on the State of Hunters in PVE by Xeltes</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/01/04/minor-updates/#comment-8413</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xeltes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=5076#comment-8413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the best way to fix this is making an NPC like the etherals that do the transmog , that if you have a legendary he will give you a quest for you to gather this crazy amount of really rare materials and pay like 50K then the NPC can &quot;reforge&quot; your old legendary to a new legendary. That way more players can have a chance to have a good weapon that at the same time is not gonna be easy to get, cause there is still the 1% drop rate for the rare or the items to make the rares, like the bindings for thunder Fury or the shards for Val&#039;anyr. I agree that some legendary are a bit easier to get than others but that does mean is that it doesn&#039;t take a lot of time to get them]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the best way to fix this is making an NPC like the etherals that do the transmog , that if you have a legendary he will give you a quest for you to gather this crazy amount of really rare materials and pay like 50K then the NPC can &#8220;reforge&#8221; your old legendary to a new legendary. That way more players can have a chance to have a good weapon that at the same time is not gonna be easy to get, cause there is still the 1% drop rate for the rare or the items to make the rares, like the bindings for thunder Fury or the shards for Val&#8217;anyr. I agree that some legendary are a bit easier to get than others but that does mean is that it doesn&#8217;t take a lot of time to get them</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thoughts on the Raid Finder by kheldul</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/01/10/thoughts-on-the-raid-finder/#comment-8412</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kheldul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=4962#comment-8412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent post and excellent comments.

The only aspect I haven&#039;t seen is the diversity of LFR groups and doing LFR with friends.

I always find that doing a LFR with a guildmate or 6+ guildies is a much more pleasurable experience.  You can chat and have a social aspect.  And for some reason, when I go with a larger group I get paired with other larger guild groups.  Those LFR occasions are a real joy; very fast, no wipes, and no waiting around.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post and excellent comments.</p>
<p>The only aspect I haven&#8217;t seen is the diversity of LFR groups and doing LFR with friends.</p>
<p>I always find that doing a LFR with a guildmate or 6+ guildies is a much more pleasurable experience.  You can chat and have a social aspect.  And for some reason, when I go with a larger group I get paired with other larger guild groups.  Those LFR occasions are a real joy; very fast, no wipes, and no waiting around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Updated 4.3.2 Patch Notes by strutt</title>
		<link>http://outdps.com/2012/01/09/updated-4-3-2-patch-notes/#comment-8411</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[strutt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdps.com/?p=5108#comment-8411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Hunter should not be having problems with a blood DKs. That is all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Hunter should not be having problems with a blood DKs. That is all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
